статья

THE EURASIAN RACE

by Constantin von Hoffmeister

The Eurasian race is the most progressive race. Since all civilization originated on the Eurasian continent, through the collective will of the blood of the Eurasian peoples, one can clearly establish that the Eurasians, as a whole, constitute one race. This race is divided into several subraces, for example the Nordic (Aryan) one, the Semitic one, the Turkic one, the Oriental one. Of course, one also has to understand that the Eurasian root race is the Hyperborean one. Without the strident aggressiveness of the Nordic subrace, the Eurasian race would not be where it ended up - on top of the human pyramid. Hence, the Nordic subrace is the one that naturally should be the vanguard of Eurasia in the future, as it has been in the past. Joseph Stalin acknowledged this when he said (in a speech in the Kremlin to commanders of the Red Army on May 24, 1945), "Most of all, I drink to the health of the Russian nation because it is the preeminent nation of all the nations of the Soviet Union." Since the Russian people (nation) are a part of the Nordic subrace and the Soviet Union was the epitomical homeland of the Eurasian race, it is obvious that Stalin understood the vanguard role that the Nordic subrace plays in Eurasia.

One should not for one moment suppose that negroes make up a progressive race. Even Karl Marx himself agreed on this point, as is evident in his views on slavery: "As for slavery, there is no need for me to speak of its bad aspects. The only thing requiring explanation is the good side of slavery. I do not mean indirect slavery, the slavery of proletariat; I mean direct slavery, the slavery of the Blacks in Surinam, in Brazil, in the southern regions of North America. ... Slavery is therefore an economic category of paramount importance. Without slavery, North America, the most progressive nation, would be transformed into a patriarchal country." (from a letter to Pavel Vasilyevich Annenkov, 1846) Obviously, Marx argues that the enslavement of negroes was a prerequisite for the emancipation of a predominantly White AmeriKa. Without the backs of negroes on which to unload labor, White American men would be forced to toil unnecessarily. White American women would thus be deprived of the chance to exert an influence equal to that of the men. Without the negroes' work, women would have to stay at home and take care of the households themselves, instead of being productive in positions that would enable them to realize a communal way of life. Through the progressive element of slavery, women were freed from the shackles of their social roles as housewives and property of working men.

This view is decidedly materialist in that it acknowledges the evolutionary hierarchy that divides humanity into higher and lower races. It is definitely non-Marxist behavior to pretend that all races are equal. Since Marx was a Lamarckian, meaning he believed that acquired traits were inherited, it is not surprising that he held views that many leftist Communists would consider "racist." In contrast to the Trotskyite multiculturalist nonsense, the Soviet Union made great advances in racial science, in part influenced by the revolutionary breakthroughs of the Third Reich in this field.

The only race that can be considered a "root race" is the Nordic subrace. It was the Nordic subrace that was directly responsible for the greatest and most original achievements in Eurasian history. The Nordic subrace managed to infiltrate the other subraces' social strata and assume leadership positions in their respective societies. The red-haired mummies in China are but one example of the Nordic legacy that was behind the foundation of all great civilizational achievements on the Eurasian continent. The Nordic subrace is a "root race" because at its roots, deep down and far back in time, Eurasia owes its greatness exclusively to Nordic blood and genius.

CAPTAIN RUSSIA

the ideal worker in the Soviet Union the Nordic worker evident in sculptures throughout the former empire

"his shield a weapon of glory"

"is he a person or a nation of workers?"

Libertarian free White AmeriKa as the vanguard in action Nordic settlers frontiered de-Indianized the West Soviet enlightened Russia the brother brooding

CAPTAIN AMERICA asks CAPTAIN RUSSIA:
"Where is the line of demarcation?"

A bridge across the Bering Strait!

The Bloody Baron: Baron von Ungern-Sternberg, who viewed himself as the reincarnation of Genghis Khan, hated Bolsheviks and Jews equally. He equated the two. He killed, tortured and mutilated countless innocent Bolsheviks and Jews. Nevertheless, he wanted to create a Eurasian empire, a Buddhist empire with Nordic Russians as the ruling class. It is ironic that the very people he despised (Bolsheviks and Jews) were able to create the very empire that he failed to create.

The Bloody Baron: warrior Buddhist, follower of the 16th Path of Oblivion, mad, on fire. An Aryan soul in search of power. A will to solve, to obliterate to build, to drink to deny. Had cripples killed so that they could be reincarnated whole again.

While today Persia continues to be occupied by Islam, von Ungern- Sternberg wanted to liberate the peasants of Russia from the Semitic infection they suffered from, namely Orthodoxy. Buddhism, an ancient Aryan religion (before the Dalai Lamas perverted and mongrelized it), would have been able to repurify the healthy Nordic instincts within the Eurasian landmass. The Bolsheviks were also quite successful in eradicating the disease of Orthodoxy, albeit not in the noble way that von Ungern-Sternberg envisioned. European atheism is Aryan Buddhism minus the cosmic spirit of belonging.

While contemporary Muslim savages blow up statues of the great Aryan sage, von Ungern-Sternberg wanted to blow up shrines of materialism and replace them with sanctified temples where worship of the umpteenth faces of the Bhudda would have been mandatory.